Saturday, October 23, 2010

Defying the "opposite c" in Fantasy Football WR WR project strategy

During the last 5 years at least I have read in many publications from Fantasy Football strategy of "Doing the opposite" drafting two labour relations in the first and second round. Writers have gone from how the old idea of the regular budget of the regular budget was closed mentality. Let me first say that the rest of the post is based on the standard of football fantasy scoring system. Not the affected version of goal gives points for each receipt. Assuming that the question will require a blog post all their own. And what do the opposite strategy?


The first and second round is where you have to the land of the great scorers on your computer. Make sure that you can extract a fate in the 3 or 4 but rarely, and even more rare a general producer 10 comes out of anything after the 4th. There is the outlier occasional ie Matt Schaub this year although QBs have an easier racking points time. The point is in the first two rounds that need their players that separate him from other computers. Need guys than the average player at that position by the largest margin possible score. Take the weekly average higher Johnson running Chis back this year 21 vs the weekly average of the tenth best running back Deangelo Williams 13 points which is 8 points per week of separation. Now lets you do the same for WR DeSean Jackson with a weekly average of the best 10 11 14 vs Reggie Wayne. Le 3 points of separation.The have vs Chris Johnson and Reggie Wayne want Jackson and DeAngelo Williams is 5 extra points per week. A big difference. The other issue this reveals is that DeSean Jackson was not taken on 1st or 2nd round but Chris Johnson was only available in 1 second or very early.RBs are easier to predict who will be the top score where as labour relations are more difficult to pin down, and most come from outside rounds 3 higher score, then top RBs. potentially 5 top WR 10 this year not get drafted in rounds 3 1st.Want Jackson, Miles Austin, Wes Welker, Brandon Marshall and number # 11 overall Rice Sydney all could have been after for the third round.


As for the 3 of the top 10 RBs became available after the three round Ray Rice, Thomas Jones and it would have Jamaal Charles and 6 of the top 10 in the first round.


That is what you get with performers from running backs - more predictable top-level top-level.


Most of the time people used the WR/WR is strategy if you are at the end of the first queue ronda.Lo leaving with running backs are not included in their next round of selections at the end of the third and fourth startup ronda.Le mood to tire out draft Board since this autumn, and take a look at the RBs which came in the third and fourth rounds.Do you think that heel Thomas Jones would have, or perhaps only know that would have been the guy in time Ray Rice justo.Creo in subsequent rounds even the best minds in fantasy are throwing darts, while the available WRs decent appearance, a group far more profound remaining.?


Also very few WR have historically had a huge rise in punctuation, Randy Moss and Jerry Rice are few and far between where as the RBs usually have 2 or 3 scoring beasts per year.


Finally, think back to last season once more, when they were extracting renuncia.Siempre wire seems WRs
they are impact players that have been added ie.Steve Smith(New York), Percy Harvin, Simms Walker etc...and RBs relatively few though admittedly, it seems that there are a few more, then, common this year (I'm looking at you Cedric Benson and Ricky Williams).


At the end is the draft, but unless you are a Wizard of RB sleepers would be pasted with the proven double RB RB up.

0 comments:

My Fantasy Football Blog Newsletter

Contributors

Followers

Powered by Blogger.